Andreas Umland: Der ukrainische Rechtsradikalismus muss aufmerksam beobachtet werden. Trotzdem besteht bisher kein Anlass zu übergroßer Sorge

Andreas Umland: Der ukrainische Rechtsradikalismus muss aufmerksam beobachtet werden. Trotzdem besteht bisher kein Anlass zu übergroßer Sorge

Quelle: https://www.facebook.com/andreas.umland.1/posts/10202452051516070

Der ukrainische Rechtsradikalismus muss aufmerksam beobachtet und sein politischer Einfluss zurückgedrängt werden. Trotzdem besteht bisher aus vergleichender Perspektive kein Anlass zu übergrosser Sorge. Aus u.a. den drei folgenden Gründen:

1. Zur Regierungsbeteiligung von Svoboda: In der Regierung waren auch Rechtsradikale in der Slowakei (Slowakische Nationalpartei) 2006-2010, Polen 2006-2007 (mit 2 Vizepremierministern, Liga polnischer Familien, “Selbstverteidigung”) und heute in Lettland die Nationale Allianz.
Bekannt sind auch die Beispiel aus Österreich, Italien usw.
Selbst in der EU ist rechtsradikale Regierungsbeteiligung nichts ungewöhnliches.

2. 2000 war Vadim Tudor in Rumaenien und 2002 Le Pen in Frankreich jeweils in der Stichwahl bzw. 2. Runde der Praesidentschaftswahlen. Bisher gab es so etwas in der Ukraine nicht. Jarosh kommt derzeit auf ca. 2,5% und Tiahnybok auf ca. 3,5%.

3. 2012 stieg Svoboda und 2014 der Rechte Sektor IN REAKTION auf die prorussische Politik Janukowitschs auf. Vorher gab es in der Ukraine kaum Rechtsextremismus. Ein erheblicher Teil der Unterstützung für ukrainischen Rechtsradikalismus ist befreiungs- und nicht ethnonationalistisch.

Posted in Analytik – Deutsch, Deutsch | Tagged , , , , | 13 Comments

Anton Shekhovtsov: Fascism, “borderless as our lands, and red as our blood”

Anton Shekhovtsov: Fascism, “borderless as our lands, and red as our blood”

17.03.2014

Source: Anton Shekhovtsov’s blog http://anton-shekhovtsov.blogspot.de/2014/03/fascism-borderless-as-our-lands-and-red.html

On the 15th of March, Moscow has witnessed – in addition to the anti-war and anti-imperialist march – a march in support of the Russian military occupation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea. The latter was organised by the Essence of Time movement founded and headed by Russian National-Bolshevik Sergey Kurginyan. Here are some pictures from the pro-Kremlin march.

 

 

 

The symbolism of the whole event is best understood by noting a quote from one of the articles by Kurginyan‘s colleague and ideological ally, Russian fascist Aleksandr Dugin. In his article “Fascism – borderless and red”, he wrote (the original quote in Russian can be found below):

Russian socialism should be built by new people, a new type of people, a new class. A class of heroes and revolutionaries. The remains of the party nomenclature and their ramshackle order should fall victim to the socialist revolution. The Russian national revolution. The Russians are longing for freshness, for modernity, for unfeigned romanticism, for living participation in some great cause. Everything that they are offered today is either archaic (the national patriots) or boring and cynical (the liberals).

The dance and the attack, fashion and aggression, excessiveness and discipline, will and gesture, fanaticism and irony will seethe in the national revolutionaries – young, malicious, merry, fearless, passionate and not knowing limits. They will build and destroy, rule and fulfill orders, conduct purges of the enemies of the nation and tenderly take care of Russian elderly and children. Wrathfully and merrily will they approach the citadel of the ramshackle and rotten System sic. Yes, they deeply thirst for Power. They know how to use it. They will breathe Life in society, they will shove the people into the sweet process of creating History. New people. Finally, intelligent and brave. Such as are needed. Who take the outer world as a strike (in the words of Golovin).

Immediately before his death, the French fascist writer Robert Brasillach voiced a strange prophecy: “I see how in the East, in Russia, fascism is rising – a fascism borderless and red”.

Note: Not a faded, brownish-pinkish national capitalism, but the blinding dawn of a new Russian Revolution, fascism – borderless as our lands, and red as our blood.


 

Строить такой русский социализм должны новые люди, новый тип людей, новый класс. Класс героев и революционеров. Останки партноменклатуры и их ветхий строй должны пасть жертвой социалистической революции. Русской национальной революции. Русские истосковались по свежести, по современности, по неподдельному романтизму, по живому соучастию в каком-то великом деле. Все то, что им предлагается сегодня, либо архаично (национал-патриоты), либо скучно и цинично (либералы).

Танец и атака, мода и агрессия, чрезмерность и дисциплина, воля и жест, фанатизм и ирония забурлят в национальных революционерах – юных, злых, веселых, бесстрашных, страстных и не знающих границ. Им – строить и разрушать, править и исполнять приказания, осуществлять чистки врагов нации и нежно заботиться о русских стариках и детях. Гневным и веселым шагом приблизятся они к цитадели ветхой, прогнившей Системы. Да, они кровно жаждут Власти. Они знают, как ей распорядиться. Они вдохнут в общество Жизнь, они ввергнут народ в сладостный процесс творения Истории. Новые люди. Наконец-то умные и отважные. Такие, как надо. Воспринимающие внешний мир как удар (по выражению Головина).

Французский фашистский писатель Робер Бразийяк перед самой смертью произнес странное пророчество: “Я вижу, как на Востоке, в России восходит фашизм, фашизм безграничный и красный”.

Заметьте: не блеклый, коричневато-розоватый национал-капитализм, а ослепительная заря новой Русской Революции, фашизм безграничный, как наши земли, и красный, как наша кровь.

Posted in "Voices" in English, Blogs | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Information Resistance: On the Subject of TV anchor Kiselyov and Radioactive Dust

Dmitry Tymchuk, Information Resistance

Information Resistance

Information Resistance

March 17, 2014
Translated and edited by Voices of Ukraine 

Yesterday’s statement by the über-propagandist [Dmitry] Kiselyov on the “Russia One” channel provoked great reaction. Putin’s Jolly Jester suddenly started broadcasting, “Russia is the only country in the world that is actually capable of turning the U.S. into radioactive dust.” Then, he started to scare the viewers with Perimeter [also known as Dead Hand], “our system of guaranteed nuclear retaliation.”

In order to fully enjoy the charming stupidity of Mr. Kiselyov, we must take a short detour back in history. In particular, we must remember that at the beginning of the nuclear arms race, the United States and the USSR have been constantly solving the problem of guaranteed nuclear retaliation, i.e.: creating a system capable of launching a nuclear response at the enemy under any circumstances – even if the target country has turned into ashes.

Initially, under the concept of “second-strike” the concept of “fail-deadly nuclear deterrence” was developed. That is, the enemy launches intercontinental ballistic missiles  [ICBMs] at us, and during their flight, we track their trajectory and manage to use our ICBMs against the enemy before they “land” on our territory.

However, it became very clear very soon that the creation of such an effective system was quite problematic. This is when the notion of guaranteed nuclear retaliation was introduced in the USSR, which was used to create the “Perimeter” nuclear control system mentioned by Kiselyov (Index Book of the MoD: 15Э601).

In essence, this system automatically gives the command to deploy the ICBMs and launch a massive nuclear strike at the enemy. However, Kiselyov failed to specify that the system works only when all command posts of Strategic Missile Forces (RSVN) are turned into dust, and Putin takes his “nuclear briefcase” and reports to the Apostle Peter, and gets sent away you-know-where. Meanwhile, the surviving population of the great and mighty Russia comfortably fits within the administrative boundaries of the village Ivanovka near Syzran [West of Russia.]

1010140_10152267808565801_1080403740_n

Therefore, if the “Perimeter” system is launched the way Kiselyov portrays it, it is not clear whether the U.S. will turn into dust (given the overall state of the Russian army). But Russia will turn to dust completely then.

Posted in Analytics, English, English News, Languages, News, News summary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Jörg Drescher: Komischer Tag heute…

Jörg Drescher: Komischer Tag heute…

Quelle: https://www.facebook.com/iovialis/posts/10202578716847862?stream_ref=10

Komischer Tag heute. Hier, bei Facebook, lese ich viele Analysen zu dem Referendum auf der Krim und wie die Wahlfälschungen aussahen… Sorry, aber wer hat bitte geglaubt, daß das “sauber” abläuft? Wer hat realistisch ein anderes Ergebnis erwartet?

Das “böse Erwachen” wird noch kommen. Eigentlich rechnete ich damit, daß heute Schüsse fallen. Doch sind wohl alle ausreichend beschäftigt, sich über den Coup aus Moskau zu erregen.

Aber es dauerte auch beim “Diktatur-Gesetz” ein paar Tage, bis die Ukrainer “sauer genug” waren…

Posted in "Voice" auf Deutsch, Crimea | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

TURKEY: under Ottoman Empire treaty with Catherine the Great if Crimea declares independence it returns to Turkey

03.17.2014  12:37  egalite.com.ua
Translated by Anna Mausi Shvets and edited by Voices of Ukraine

The Turkish newspaper Hürriyet reports that if the Autonomous Republic of Crimea announces its independence, then it falls under Turkish rule. This is being reported by ipress.ua with reference to Espresso TV.

Based on what the author of the article wrote, this is confirmed by the agreement which was signed 230 years ago by the Ottoman and Russian empires.

According to the agreement, signed by the the Russian empress Catherine the Great on April 19, 1783, the Crimean peninsula will pass from the Ottoman empire to the Russian empire.

“However, one of the most important points is the clause that stipulates conditions that if the peninsula does not declare its independence then it cannot be transferred to a third party. Otherwise, Crimea must automatically be returned under the aegis of Turkey,” claims the author.

He notes that in 1991, after the collapse of the USSR and the emergence of an independent Ukraine, Turkey has already had the formal right to reclaim Crimea.

“However, the Turkish government, then led by Turgut Ozal, given the geopolitical changes in northern Turkey and changes in the general world economic situation, did not defend that position. Turkey limited itself to demanding that the rights of Crimean Tatars, living as a minority in Crimea, be restored,” the author quotes from the publication of the Crimean Tatar agency QHA.

But if you want to join Crimea to Russia, it is necessary for it to first officially declare independence from Kyiv. “And in that moment, if all norms of international governance are followed, Turkey can announce: “I’m taking control of Crimea,” the author concluded.

Source: http://egalite.com.ua/news/1584

Related reading:
Lost Islamic History, “Did Russia Really Promise Crimea to Turkey?”

Posted in Analytics, Crimea, English, English News, Languages, News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 75 Comments