In Sewastopol haben 123% der Einwohner für die Abtrennung der Krim gestimmt.

Quelle: http://teh-nomad.livejournal.com/2007998.html

Übersetzung: Olha Poberezhna

Offizielle Erklärung von der Krim:

Die Wahlbeteiligung auf der Krim hat 81,36 % betragen, sagte der Vorsitzende der Wahlkommission von der Werchowna Rada der Krim, Mychajlo Malyschew. „Vor 20:00 Uhr haben 1.250.426 Personen ihre Stimme abgegeben. Da sind die Wahlergebnisse aus Sewastopol nicht miteingerechnet. Mit Sewastopol sind es 1.724.563 Personen.“ – sagte er.

Rechnen wir mal nach:

1.724.563-1.250.426 = 474.137 Personen haben in Sewastopol abgestimmt.

Schauen wir uns die statistische Webseite der Stadt Sewastopol an:

Click to access ludi_1013.pdf

Ende des letzten Jahres hat die Bevölkerung von Sewastopol 385.462 Einwohner gezählt. Darunter Kinder, die nicht wahlberechtigt sind.

474.137 – 385.462 = 88 675 Personen Bevölkerungszuwachs in Sewastopol während des Referendums.

474.137 / 385.462 * 100 = 123 % der Einwohner Sewastopols haben für die Angliederung der Krim an Russland gestimmt.

Das bedeutet, dass alle an der Wahl teilgenommen haben müssen – Babys, Schüler, und wahrscheinlich auch Tote.

viaIn Sewastopol haben 123% der Einwohner für die Abtrennung der Krim gestimmt..

viaIn Sewastopol haben 123% der Einwohner für die Abtrennung der Krim gestimmt..

Posted in Analytik – Deutsch, Crimea, Deutsch, Languages | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Anton Shekhovtsov: Pro-Russian extremists observe the illegitimate Crimean “referendum”

Anton Shekhovtsov: Pro-Russian extremists observe the illegitimate Crimean “referendum”

 17.03.2014

Source: Anton Shekhovtsov’s blog http://anton-shekhovtsov.blogspot.de/2014/03/pro-russian-extremists-observe.html

As I wrote in this blog many times, Putin’s increasingly fascistizing Russia has long been cooperating with the European extreme right that see in Russia an example to follow.

The illegitimate “referendum” in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, which was held in this Ukrainian region at the gunpoint of Russian invaders on Sunday, has proven my point again. Supported by the pariah states such as North Korea and Assad’s Syria, yet strongly defied by the civilised world that is beginning to understand the terrifying nature of Putin’s Russia, the Crimean “referendum” has, however, been hailed as “fair” and “legitimate” by a number of European “election monitors” who have been hired by dubious European structures and who have clear links to the extreme right, as well as the extreme left.

The main organisation which invited right-wing and left-wing extremists to monitor the Crimean “referendum” is the Eurasian Observatory For Democracy & Elections (EODE). It is headed by Luc Michel (1958) and Jean-Pierre Vandersmissen (???). Both are followers of the major Belgian collaborationist and neo-Nazi Jean-François Thiriart and members of the extreme right Parti Communautaire National-Européen (PCN-NCP).

Luc Michel

 

Jean-Pierre Vandersmissen and Fabrice Beaur (PCN-NCP) in the break-away “state” of Transnistria

The list of the “monitors” invited by the EONE has not been published in full, but – thanks to various sources – the following observers of the Crimean “referendum” have been identified.


 

Austria

Johannes Hübner (1956), member of the radical right-wing populist Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ).

Johannes Hübner

Johann Gudenus (1976), member of the radical right-wing populist FPÖ.

Johann Gudenus

Johann Stadler (1961), former member of the FPÖ, current member of the radical right-wing populist Alliance for the Future of Austria (BZÖ).

Johann Stadler

 

Belgium

Frank Creyelman (1961), former member of the extreme right Vlaams Blok, current member of the extreme right Vlaams Belang.

Frank Creyelman

Luc Michel (1958), former member of the neo-Nazi Fédération d’action nationale et européenne (FANE), current member of the extreme right Parti Communautaire National-Européen (PCN-NCP).

Luc Michel

Jan Penris (1964), member of the extreme right Vlaams Belang.

Jan Penris

Christian Verougstraete (1950), member of the extreme right Vlaams Belang, member of the pan-European radical right-wing Alliance of European National Movements (AENM).

Christian Verougstraete

 

Bulgaria

Pavel Chernev (1969), member of the extreme right Ataka party.

Pavel Chernev

Kiril Kolev (1990), member the extreme right Ataka party.

Kiril Kolev

Finland
Erkki Johan Bäckman (1971), neo-Stalinist who does not recognise Estonia and Latvia as states. Banned from teaching at the University of Helsinki for distorting the history of the Baltic states.

Johan Bäckman

France

Aymeric Chauprade (1969), member of the radical right-wing populist National Front, adviser on international issues.

Aymeric Chauprade

 

Germany

Hikmat Al-Sabty (1954), Iraq-born member of the left-wing Die Linke. Known for anti-Israel activities.

Hikmat Al-Sabty

Greece

Charalampos Angourakis (1951), member of the neo-Stalinist, eurosceptic Communist Party of Greece (KKE).

Charalampos Angourakis

Hungary

Béla Kovács (1960), member of extreme right Jobbik, treasurer of the AENM.

Béla Kovács

Italy

Fabrizio Bertot (1967), member of mafia boss Silvio Berlusconi’s right-wing Forza Italia.

Fabrizio Bertot

Latvia

Miroslavs Mitrofanovs (1966), co-chair of the pro-Russian party For Human Rights in United Latvia.

Miroslavs Mitrofanovs

Tatjana Ždanoka (1950), former member of the Communist Party of Latvia, former member of the  Interfront that opposed Latvia’s independence from the Soviet Union, current member of the pro-Russian party For Human Rights in United Latvia.

Tatjana Ždanoka

Poland

Mateusz Piskorski (1977), member of the radical right-wing Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland.

Mateusz Piskorski

Serbia

Milenko Baborac (1966), member of the far right, ultra-Orthodox Dveri Movement.

Milenko Baborac

Nenad Popović (1966), vice-president of the right-wing eurosceptic Democratic Party of Serbia, president of the honorary council of the Russian-Serbian Friendship Society.

Nenad Popović

Zoran Radojicic (???), member of the far right, ultra-Orthodox Dveri Movement.

Zoran Radojicic

Spain

Enrique Ravello (1968), former member of the neo-Nazi CEDADE, former member of the extreme right, neo-pagan Terre et Peuple organisation, current member of the extreme right Plataforma per Catalunya.

Enrique Ravello

Russia

Oleg Denisenko (1962), member of the neo-Stalinist, national-bolshevik Communist Party of the Russian Federation.

Oleg Denisenko

USA

Srđa Trifković (1954), Serbia-born anti-Semitic and Islamophobic writer. Known as an advocate of Slobodan Milošević‘s regime.

Srđa Trifković

This list gives us a very accurate idea of who Putin’s allies are: right-wing extremists, neo-Stalinists, eurosceptics, neo-Nazis, etc.* One question remains unanswered though: When approached by the EODE, a number of European far right parties officially declined to send their representatives to observe the Crimean “referendum”, but “monitors” from the National Front, Freedom Party of Austria and Vlaams Belang did go to the Crimea. The answer seems to lie in the European Parliament elections that will be held in May 2014. Since, in Europe, Putin’s Russia is being increasingly considered a very dangerous pariah state, it seems reasonable to suggest that far right parties do not want to risk alienating their potential voters and, instead, allowed their members to make individual decisions as to whether become observers at the illegal “referendum” or not.

In conclusion, some sad humour: many European “observers” were allowed to enter Ukraine so easily, because Ukraine had liberated the visa regime for EU nationals. They can freely travel to Ukraine and stay in the country up to three months. (The EU has not returned the favour to Ukrainians yet.) Russia has no such liberal norms, and the process of obtaining Russian visas is very complicated. If the Crimea becomes Russian, the extremist “observers” will have to arrange Russian visas to enter the region again. However, I doubt they would want to go to the Crimea: their task was to disrupt the peace in the region, rather than contribute to its prosperity and flourishing.

* – I should stress that this list is not complete, and I will be grateful for verifiable additions to this list, as well as relevant corrections and amendments.

Posted in Analytics, Blogs, Crimea, English | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

EUROPA: Response to Crimean Referendum – Joint Statement by European Council and European Commission Heads

Joint statement by President of the European Council Herman Van Rompuy and President of the European Commission José Manuel Barroso on Crimea

European Commission – STATEMENT/14/71   16/03/2014

Image

European Commission Statement

Brussels, 16 March 2014

Joint statement by President of the European Council Herman Van Rompuy and President of the European Commission José Manuel Barroso on Crimea

Brussels, 16 March 2014 – As stated by all 28 EU Heads of State or Government on 6 March 2014, the European Union considers the holding of the referendum on the future status of the territory of Ukraine as contrary to the Ukrainian Constitution and international law. The referendum is illegal and illegitimate and its outcome will not be recognised.

The solution to the crisis in Ukraine must be based on the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, in the framework of the Ukrainian Constitution as well as the strict adherence to international standards. Only working together through diplomatic processes, including direct discussions between the Governments of Ukraine and Russia, can we find a solution to the crisis. The European Union has a special responsibility for peace, stability and prosperity on the European continent and will continue pursuing these objectives using all available channels.

We reiterate the strong condemnation of the unprovoked violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and call on Russia to withdraw its armed forces to their pre-crisis numbers and the areas of their permanent stationing, in accordance with relevant agreements.

In advancing these goals, the Ministers of Foreign Affairs will evaluate the situation tomorrow in Brussels and decide on additional measures in line with the declaration of the Heads of State and Government of the EU of 6 March.

Contacts :Pia AHRENKILDE HANSEN: + 32 (0) 498 95 3070Helen KEARNS: + 32 (0) 498 98 76 38

For the public: Europe Direct by phone 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 or by e­mail

Posted in Crimea, English, English News, Maidan Diary, News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

FULL TEXT of US Executive Order on Ukraine-Related Sanctions (including names & Russian officials)

The White House
Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release
March 17, 2014

FACT SHEET: Ukraine-Related Sanctions

 Source: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/03/17/fact-sheet-ukraine-related-sanctions

President Obama today issued a new Executive Order (E.O.) under the national emergency with respect to Ukraine that finds that the actions and policies of the Russian government with respect to Ukraine -– including through the deployment of Russian military forces in the Crimea region of Ukraine –- undermine democratic processes and institutions in Ukraine; threaten its peace, security, stability, sovereignty, and territorial integrity; and contribute to the misappropriation of its assets.

This new authority expands upon E.O. 13660, which the President signed less than two weeks ago, by authorizing the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, to impose sanctions on named officials of the Russian government, any individual or entity that operates in the Russian arms industry, and any designated individual or entity that acts on behalf of, or that provides material or other support to, any senior Russian government official.  We have fashioned these sanctions to impose costs on named individuals who wield influence in the Russian government and those responsible for the deteriorating situation in Ukraine.  We stand ready to use these authorities in a direct and targeted fashion as events warrant.

In response to the Russian government’s actions contributing to the crisis in Ukraine, this new E.O. lists seven Russian government officials who are being designated for sanctions.  These individuals are

Vladislav Surkov, Sergey Glazyev, Leonid Slutsky, Andrei Klishas, Valentina Matviyenko, Dmitry Rogozin, and Yelena Mizulina.

The United States also will seek to hold accountable individuals who use their resources or influence to support or act on behalf of senior Russian government officials.  We recognize that the Russian leadership derives significant support from, and takes action through, individuals who do not themselves serve in any official capacity.  Our current focus is to identify these individuals and target their personal assets, but not companies that they may manage on behalf of the Russian state.

In addition to the new E.O., the Treasury Department today has imposed sanctions on four other individuals under E.O. 13660, issued on March 6, for their actions or policies that threaten the peace, security, stability, sovereignty, or territorial integrity of Ukraine and in undermining the Government of Ukraine.  They are

Crimea-based separatist leaders Sergey Aksyonov and Vladimir Konstantinov; former Ukrainian presidential chief of staff Viktor Medvedchuk; and former President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych.

Today’s actions send a strong message to the Russian government that there are consequences for their actions that violate the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine, including their actions supporting the illegal referendum for Crimean separation.  The United States, together with international partners, will continue to stand by the Ukrainian government to ensure that costs are imposed on Crimean separatists and their Russian backers.  Today’s actions also serve as notice to Russia that unless it abides by its international obligations and returns its military forces to their original bases and respects Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, the United States is prepared to take additional steps to impose further political and economic costs.

  • Vladislav Surkov:  Surkov is being sanctioned for his status as a Presidential Aide to Russian President Vladimir Putin.
  • Sergey Glazyev:  Glazyev is being sanctioned for his status as a Presidential Adviser to Russian President Vladimir Putin.
  • Leonid Slutsky:  Slutsky is being sanctioned for his status as a State Duma deputy, where he is Chairman of the Duma Committee on CIS Affairs, Eurasian Integration, and Relations with Compatriots.
  • Andrei Klishas:  Klishas is being sanctioned for his status as a Member of the Council of Federation of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation and as Chairman of the Federation Council Committee of Constitutional Law, Judicial, and Legal Affairs, and the Development of Civil Society.
  • Valentina Matviyenko:  Matviyenko is being sanctioned for her status as Head of the Federation Council
  • Dmitry Rogozin:  Rogozin is being sanctioned for his status as the Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation.
  • Yelena Mizulina:  Mizulina is being sanctioned for her status as a State Duma Deputy.
  • Sergey Aksyonov:  Aksyonov is being designated for threatening the peace, security, stability, sovereignty, or territorial integrity of Ukraine, and for undermining Ukraine’s democratic institutions and processes.  Aksyonov claims to be the Prime Minister of Crimea and has rejected the authority of the legitimate government in Kyiv.
  • Vladimir Konstantinov:  Konstantinov is being designated for threatening the peace, security, stability, sovereignty, or territorial integrity of Ukraine, and for undermining Ukraine’s democratic institutions and processes.  Konstantinov is the speaker of the Crimean parliament, which on March 11, 2014, declared independence from Ukraine.
  • Viktor Medvedchuk:  Medvedchuk, leader of Ukrainian Choice, is being designated for threatening the peace, security, stability, sovereignty, or territorial integrity of Ukraine, and for undermining Ukraine’s democratic institutions and processes.  He is also being designated because he has materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support to Yanukovych and because he is a leader of an entity that has, or whose members have, engaged in actions or policies that undermine democratic processes or institutions in Ukraine and actions or policies that threaten the peace, security, stability, sovereignty, or territorial integrity of Ukraine.
  • Viktor Yanukovych:  Former Ukrainian President Yanukovych is being designated for threatening the peace, security, stability, sovereignty, or territorial integrity of Ukraine, and for undermining Ukraine’s democratic institutions and processes.  After abandoning Kyiv and ultimately fleeing to Russia, Viktor Yanukovych called upon Russian President Vladimir Putin to send Russian troops into Ukraine.
Posted in Crimea, English, English News, Maidan Diary, News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Putin’s Father Served in the Vlasov Army

chornajuravka's avatarEuromaidan PR

The Polish weekly magazine ANGORA, No. 31 (03 August, 2003), in its section “Secrets of History”, p.11, published a note by Jozef Szaniawski titled: “Did Russian President’s Father Participate in Crushing the Warsaw Uprising?”

Below is the translation of this note.

View original post 512 more words

Posted in Reblogged | Leave a comment