SBU: snipers and radioactive material for a dirty bomb

chornajuravka's avatarEuromaidan PR

Tuesday, May 6, 2014, 17:53

The State Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) reported on the elimination of a snipers’ nest at the TV Tower in the city of Konstantinivka on May 3. SBU spokesperson Marina Ostapenko reported on it at a briefing in the Anti-Terrorist Center.

According to Ostapenko, during the operation the Alpha special unit was resisted by a group of gunmen twice its size. “We have injured officers. As far as I know there are two of them, but they are alive. And Alpha fully accomplished its task; the firing point of the enemy was destroyed,” Ostapenko said.

View original post 238 more words

Posted in Reblogged | Leave a comment

Some comparisons between Maidan and Antimaidan in Odesa

By Sergey Zoo
05.05.2014 Facebook
Translated and edited by Voices of Ukraine

1) The Odesa Maidan had never attacked the camp at the Kulikovo [Field] before, even though they could have done so easily and on multiple occasions. As a rule, few people were there [at the Antimaidan camp], no serious fortifications were in place, and the camp was present 24/7. You could come there on any day and at any time.

However, people from the Kulikovo Field came and attacked the Odesa Maidan several times, even though the camp by the Duke [Richelieu Monument] was not standing 24/7. Moreover, daily gatherings by the Duke had stopped recently. During one of the more recent incidents, four of the attackers were detained. They were found carrying weapons, and handed over to the cops. The cops set them free.

2) There were, indeed, multiple calls to do something about the camp at the Kulikovo Field. They were especially loud after each new assault on the “Duke camp.” These calls came from ordinary protesters who were fed up, both with the enemy going unpunished, and with some strange visitors, who were obviously there to provoke. The leaders [of Odesa Maidan] stopped these initiatives every time.

The leaders of the Kulikovo camp were seen in the town center when the Antimaidan assaulted the march. In other words, they led the Kulikovo crowd there, even though they knew full well that the march from Sobornaya Square was going to the [football] game, not to the Kulikovo camp. The same leaders ushered their men into the Trade Unions House, even though it was clear that their attackers would not stop at dismantling the camp–given the size of the crowd and the height of their anger following the assault on the peaceful rally and the murder of pro-Ukrainian activists in the town center. By the way, the Kulikovo leaders are all safe and sound.

3) Gatherings by the Duke, as well as events in other parts of the city, were canceled many times, specifically because guys from the Kulikovo camp were expected to show up. The events were canceled to avoid clashes. The latest example of that happened very recently, when there was yet another march under Russian flags, going from the Kulikovo field to the Duke Monument.

I can’t recall the Kulikovo crowd canceling any events to avoid clashes. If this ever happened, please tell me when and where. Furthermore, they broke the agreement to refrain from carrying any Russian flags around the city on April 10. The size of the flag carried through the city on April 10 was seen not only by Odesans, but by all of Russia, broadcast on live TV.

And another important comparison: when the “monsters-killers-Banderites” got to Kulikovo Field last night [May 4], the first thing they did was form a human shield around all the flowers and oil lamps set up as a memorial for the dead, just to make sure no one would destroy it in a fit of rage. This happened despite the fact that the memorial had plenty of those St. George ribbons, which serve to make many people sick by now. Despite the fact that it was quite clear who’d set up that memorial. But it was not destroyed–moreover, everything was done to protect it. No active protection was needed, however, and the human shield was eventually called off. Then ALL the dead were honored with a minute of silence. Not just the dead from our side.

It is, however, no secret who destroyed a similar memorial by the Duke, with photos of those killed at Instytutska Street in Kyiv. That was done 40 days after the shooting at Instytutska Street [the Orthodox commemorate their dead on the 40th day after death].

These are the comparisons. It would be very easy to verify everything I wrote about. Let everyone draw their own conclusions.

Source: Sergey Zoo Fb

Posted in "Voices" in English, Analytics, Eyewitness stories, Maidan Diary, Odesa, Regіons, Social Media, Voices of Revolution | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

I’ve just spoken with a person from Kramatorsk

By Sergii Gorbachov
05.05.2014 Facebook
Translated and edited by Voices of Ukraine

I won’t tell his name so as not to endanger him (those bitches monitor the web).

===

08:25 Sergii Gorbachev (SG)

Good morning. Is everything ok? Have any of your friends been harmed?

08:26 AM Kramatorsk

Thanks, everything is ok. Only the guys from the barricades were harmed, my friends don’t go there

08:27 SG

Briefly, how are things? We can’t understand shit

8:27 AM Kramatorsk

By the way, the dead “nurse” isn’t a nurse at all.

8:30 AM SG

That could be expected. Did she go to the barricades?

8:32 AM Kramatorsk

I realize you don’t speak badly of the dead… she’s a local vocational school student, she hung around the ExecCom building, hit on guys with guns… she wore the cross armband for show… and when the shooting started her friends gave her a ride to see it… it’s unclear what happened later.

Her own could have killed her… they were given the assault rifles, yet they have no brains… it’s a critical combat situation, everyone shot at from all sides…

8:36 AM SG

I see, however, the Russian propaganda will still spout its lies. Most importantly: who controls the town now?

8:36 AM Kramatorsk

NO ONE!!!

The PRD [People’s Republic of Donetsk] can’t and won’t, the local authorities can’t work… the police exists in principle, but does nothing… the military isn’t going to take the town under control… they just stay in the fields around town…

8:40 AM SG

F..k… pardon my French…

Is there food and water in the town? Hasn’t the supply been blocked?

8:42 AM Kramatorsk

Well, looks like there is… I haven’t visited the stores yet…

8:45 AM SG

I see. We can only hope for the best. And for reasonable people to wake up.

8:47 AM Kramatorsk

Sergii, it doesn’t matter if we wake up… we need support…

8:47 AM SG

And what do you need most now?

8:48 AM Kramatorsk

Some decisiveness from the authorities in Kyiv… There are groups here that have NO problems with weapons! What can we put up against them–marches with ribbons?

I’ve passed three pro-Russian checkpoints today: they have LOTS of weapons… Everything is brand new, a guy sits on each side of the road with an assault rifle and a grenade launcher… and he’s sitting on a crate of weapons!!!

The army stays between the towns… the towns are under FULL control of those guys…

However, Avakov is right about something: ok, we do clear the towns, and what’s next? Who do we hand them to?

8:52 AM SG

How many pro-Ukrainians are really ready to take up weapons?

8:53 AM Kramatorsk

I dunno, we didn’t count, but there are enough… many friends are interested: “Will there be a militia? I would join it, if it isn’t organized by the Ministry of Internal Affairs, because Avakov can only wag his tongue…”

===

P.S. I’ve left everything intact. The conflicting opinions on Avakov are opinions of two different people.

“Avakov is right in some things” is the opinion of the person I talked with. “Avakov can only wag his tongue” is the opinion of his friends.

Concerning the point that “there’s no one to hand the power to in the town” – that means that if there are no armed pro-Ukrainians in the town, there won’t be anyone to hand the town to: no one would hold it.

Source: Sergii Gorbachov Fb

 

Posted in "Voices" in English, English, Eyewitness stories, Regіons, South&Eastern Ukraine, Voices of Revolution | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Reversing the Logic of Escalation in Ukraine: Next Steps by the Swiss OSCE Chairmanship

Bern, 06.05.2014 – Vienna, 6 May 2014
Austrian Presidency of the Council of Europe
Speech by the President of the Swiss Confederation,
Mr. Didier Burkhalter

Dear colleagues

I am grateful that we are having this debate on Ukraine. We have reached a pivotal moment, both for Ukraine and for Europe. It is important that we do not turn our backs against each other in this situation. Rather, we should all commit to resolving this crisis through dialogue.

As you know, Switzerland is chairing the OSCE this year. From the beginning of our Chairmanship, we have been closely involved in efforts to assist Ukraine in resolving this crisis. I take the liberty of addressing you here as Chairperson-in-Office of the OSCE. And I wish to make four main points:

First, we need to reverse the logic of escalation that has marked this crisis so far.

Just a few months ago, in early December last year, most of us met in Kiev for the OSCE Ministerial Council. Little did we anticipate then how much the Ukraine crisis would evolve and expand. Today, not even half a year later, Ukraine is struggling for its territorial integrity and national cohesion. Instability is growing in eastern and southern parts of the country. The spectre of new rifts looms on Europe’s horizon.

It is our duty as politicians to reverse this logic of escalation. I am convinced that we can accomplish this – it is above all a question of responsible leadership.

“Responsible” in this case means commitment to dialogue and cooperation, to de-escalatory measures and rhetoric, and to constructive engagement in the search for solutions in keeping with national and international law.

Second, we need a roadmap for the period until the elections.

Time is of the essence now. The roadmap that the Swiss Chairmanship is proposing covers a series of issues. Convergence on these issues should help stabilize the situation and provide conditions to hold the planned elections.

These issues include international commitment to presidential elections on 25 May; international commitment to the conduct of a nationwide consultative opinion poll on decentralization (in parallel with the elections), which is tied to broad national dialogue, including roundtable discussions in the regions; recommitment to implementing the measures agreed in the Geneva Statement. Security questions will also have to be addressed.

It is essential that the four parties of the Geneva Statement back such a roadmap and its implementation in the form of an Action Plan. The Swiss Chairmanship is currently consulting with the leaders of all four parties on how to proceed on this matter.

Third, the OSCE is ready to take up a lead role in implementing this roadmap.

The Special Monitoring Mission that was set up by consensus decision has been tasked to support Ukraine in implementing the Geneva Measures. We are currently evaluating how this should best be done in the light of the proposed roadmap. And we are enlarging the capacity of this Mission, from 154 monitors today to about 300 by the end of June. I invite all of you to support the Monitoring Mission with additional funding and monitors, including experts in disarmament and mediation.

The OSCE is also ready to facilitate inclusive national dialogue in Ukraine. We are convinced that such roundtables are essential to address grievances, to reassure all parties that they have a stake in the Ukrainian state, and hence to strengthen national cohesion.

Finally, the OSCE through ODIHR is observing the elections. 100 long-term observers are already deployed throughout the regions in Ukraine. An additional 900 short-term observers will follow in due time.

My fourth and final point is this: As the OSCE is demonstrating its value, we should redouble our efforts to strengthen its capacity to act.

One effect that the Ukraine crisis may well have is that not all of the priorities that the Swiss Chairmanship had defined for this year will be fulfilled. But one thing is clear: Our objective of strengthening mediation capacities in the OSCE is more relevant than ever. Bridge-building will remain in high demand, and the OSCE has an important role to play in this regard.

As ministers, it is also time to get more actively involved in the “Helsinki+40” process on the OSCE’s future. On the one hand, this may result in recommitting to the Helsinki Principles and discussing the cornerstones of European security. But on the other hand, it should also mean discussing practical measures to enable the OSCE to tap its full potential.

Source: News Portal of the Federal Authorities of the Swiss Confederation

Posted in Reblogged | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Presidential Council on Civil Society and Human Rights of the Russian Federation Report on Problems of Crimean Residents Details

chornajuravka's avatarEuromaidan PR

04.21.2014

report

Problems of Crimean residents

Review prepared by Bobrov E.A., the member of the Council, Gannushkina S.A., the head of the Network “Migration and Law” as well as by Ceytlina O.P., the lawyer of the Network. This is a review of the results of their visit to Simferopol and Sevastopol in the period between 15–18 April, 2014, meeting with state officers, journalists, human rights activists, lawyers and citizens.

Citizenship:
(Part 1/Art. 4–March 21, 2014 N6–FKZ federal constitutional law)

There were the following problems:

S1) Despite information on the FMS site, confirmation of residence and not only information about the registration of residents face challenges in issuing passports, many residents of the Crimea–citizens of Ukraine, foreign citizens and stateless persons permanently residing in Crimea, but do not have residence registration. In the Russian FMS divisions in Simferopol and Sevastopol there is no information about the possibility of this category acquiring citizenship in the Russian…

View original post 1,982 more words

Posted in Reblogged | Leave a comment